Remove an extra layer of wrapping for matchers/custom matchers
Helps reduce how nested custom matchers have to be for users as well as Jasmine internal matchers [#59161378]
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@ describe("toContain", function() {
|
||||
var util = {
|
||||
contains: jasmine.createSpy('delegated-contains').and.returnValue(true)
|
||||
},
|
||||
matcher = j$.matchers.toContain(util);
|
||||
matcherComparator = j$.matchers.toContain(util);
|
||||
|
||||
result = matcher.compare("ABC", "B");
|
||||
result = matcherComparator("ABC", "B");
|
||||
expect(util.contains).toHaveBeenCalledWith("ABC", "B", []);
|
||||
expect(result.pass).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
@@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ describe("toContain", function() {
|
||||
contains: jasmine.createSpy('delegated-contains').and.returnValue(true)
|
||||
},
|
||||
customEqualityTesters = ['a', 'b'],
|
||||
matcher = j$.matchers.toContain(util, customEqualityTesters);
|
||||
matcherComparator = j$.matchers.toContain(util, customEqualityTesters);
|
||||
|
||||
result = matcher.compare("ABC", "B");
|
||||
result = matcherComparator("ABC", "B");
|
||||
expect(util.contains).toHaveBeenCalledWith("ABC", "B", ['a', 'b']);
|
||||
expect(result.pass).toBe(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user