admin/jasmine
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Use one declaration per statement

Browse Source 
The old style of merging all of a function's variable declarations into
a single statement made some sense back in the days of var, but there's
no reason to keep doing it now that we use const and let.
This commit is contained in:
Steve Gravrock
2026-03-10 20:02:42 -07:00
parent 03ebebf6fb
commit 434575f49d
88 changed files with 3650 additions and 3604 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

36
spec/core/asymmetric_equality/ObjectContainingSpec.js
View File

@@ -53,9 +53,9 @@ describe('ObjectContaining', function() {
});
it("jasmineToString's itself", function() {
const sample = {},
matcher = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining(sample),
pp = jasmine.createSpy('pp').and.returnValue('sample');
const sample = {};
const matcher = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining(sample);
const pp = jasmine.createSpy('pp').and.returnValue('sample');
expect(matcher.jasmineToString(pp)).toEqual(
'<jasmine.objectContaining(sample)>'
@@ -144,9 +144,9 @@ describe('ObjectContaining', function() {
describe('valuesForDiff_', function() {
describe('when other is not an object', function() {
it('sets self to jasmineToString()', function() {
const containing = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining({}),
pp = privateUnderTest.makePrettyPrinter(),
result = containing.valuesForDiff_('a', pp);
const containing = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining({});
const pp = privateUnderTest.makePrettyPrinter();
const result = containing.valuesForDiff_('a', pp);
expect(result).toEqual({
self: '<jasmine.objectContaining(Object({ }))>',
@@ -157,10 +157,10 @@ describe('ObjectContaining', function() {
describe('when other is an object', function() {
it('includes keys that are present in both other and sample', function() {
const sample = { a: 1, b: 2 },
other = { a: 3, b: 4 },
containing = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining(sample),
result = containing.valuesForDiff_(other);
const sample = { a: 1, b: 2 };
const other = { a: 3, b: 4 };
const containing = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining(sample);
const result = containing.valuesForDiff_(other);
expect(result.self).not.toBeInstanceOf(
privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining
@@ -172,10 +172,10 @@ describe('ObjectContaining', function() {
});
it('includes keys that are present only in sample', function() {
const sample = { a: 1, b: 2 },
other = { a: 3 },
containing = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining(sample),
result = containing.valuesForDiff_(other);
const sample = { a: 1, b: 2 };
const other = { a: 3 };
const containing = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining(sample);
const result = containing.valuesForDiff_(other);
expect(result.self).not.toBeInstanceOf(
privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining
@@ -190,10 +190,10 @@ describe('ObjectContaining', function() {
});
it('omits keys that are present only in other', function() {
const sample = { a: 1, b: 2 },
other = { a: 3, b: 4, c: 5 },
containing = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining(sample),
result = containing.valuesForDiff_(other);
const sample = { a: 1, b: 2 };
const other = { a: 3, b: 4, c: 5 };
const containing = new privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining(sample);
const result = containing.valuesForDiff_(other);
expect(result.self).not.toBeInstanceOf(
privateUnderTest.ObjectContaining