admin/jasmine
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Use one declaration per statement

Browse Source 
The old style of merging all of a function's variable declarations into
a single statement made some sense back in the days of var, but there's
no reason to keep doing it now that we use const and let.
This commit is contained in:
Steve Gravrock
2026-03-10 20:02:42 -07:00
parent 03ebebf6fb
commit 434575f49d
88 changed files with 3650 additions and 3604 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
spec/core/matchers/toHaveClassesSpec.js
View File

@@ -1,24 +1,24 @@
describe('toHaveClasses', function() {
it('fails for a DOM element that lacks all the expected classes', function() {
const matcher = privateUnderTest.matchers.toHaveClasses(),
result = matcher.compare(
specHelpers.domHelpers.createElementWithClassName(''),
['foo', 'bar']
);
const matcher = privateUnderTest.matchers.toHaveClasses();
const result = matcher.compare(
specHelpers.domHelpers.createElementWithClassName(''),
['foo', 'bar']
);
expect(result.pass).toBe(false);
});
it('passes for a DOM element that has all the expected classes', function() {
const matcher = privateUnderTest.matchers.toHaveClasses(),
el = specHelpers.domHelpers.createElementWithClassName('foo bar baz');
const matcher = privateUnderTest.matchers.toHaveClasses();
const el = specHelpers.domHelpers.createElementWithClassName('foo bar baz');
expect(matcher.compare(el, ['foo', 'bar']).pass).toBe(true);
});
it('fails for a DOM element that only has some matching classes', function() {
const matcher = privateUnderTest.matchers.toHaveClasses(),
el = specHelpers.domHelpers.createElementWithClassName('foo bar');
const matcher = privateUnderTest.matchers.toHaveClasses();
const el = specHelpers.domHelpers.createElementWithClassName('foo bar');
expect(matcher.compare(el, ['foo', 'can']).pass).toBe(false);
});