Use Jasmine's arrayContains, instead of includes for better support

This commit is contained in:
Gregg Van Hove
2018-02-26 17:57:37 -08:00
parent fdecf02472
commit 63cc7cafc8
2 changed files with 6 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -2535,7 +2535,7 @@ getJasmineRequireObj().ExceptionFormatter = function(j$) {
var empty = true; var empty = true;
for (var prop in error) { for (var prop in error) {
if (ignored.includes(prop)) { if (j$.util.arrayContains(ignored, prop)) {
continue; continue;
} }
result[prop] = error[prop]; result[prop] = error[prop];

View File

@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ getJasmineRequireObj().ExceptionFormatter = function(j$) {
var empty = true; var empty = true;
for (var prop in error) { for (var prop in error) {
if (ignored.includes(prop)) { if (j$.util.arrayContains(ignored, prop)) {
continue; continue;
} }
result[prop] = error[prop]; result[prop] = error[prop];