Use Jasmine's arrayContains, instead of includes for better support
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2535,7 +2535,7 @@ getJasmineRequireObj().ExceptionFormatter = function(j$) {
|
|||||||
var empty = true;
|
var empty = true;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (var prop in error) {
|
for (var prop in error) {
|
||||||
if (ignored.includes(prop)) {
|
if (j$.util.arrayContains(ignored, prop)) {
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
result[prop] = error[prop];
|
result[prop] = error[prop];
|
||||||
|
|||||||
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ getJasmineRequireObj().ExceptionFormatter = function(j$) {
|
|||||||
var empty = true;
|
var empty = true;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (var prop in error) {
|
for (var prop in error) {
|
||||||
if (ignored.includes(prop)) {
|
if (j$.util.arrayContains(ignored, prop)) {
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
result[prop] = error[prop];
|
result[prop] = error[prop];
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user