Use Jasmine's arrayContains, instead of includes for better support
This commit is contained in:
@@ -2535,7 +2535,7 @@ getJasmineRequireObj().ExceptionFormatter = function(j$) {
|
||||
var empty = true;
|
||||
|
||||
for (var prop in error) {
|
||||
if (ignored.includes(prop)) {
|
||||
if (j$.util.arrayContains(ignored, prop)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
result[prop] = error[prop];
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ getJasmineRequireObj().ExceptionFormatter = function(j$) {
|
||||
var empty = true;
|
||||
|
||||
for (var prop in error) {
|
||||
if (ignored.includes(prop)) {
|
||||
if (j$.util.arrayContains(ignored, prop)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
result[prop] = error[prop];
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user