Remove support for excution orders that re-enter suites
This commit is contained in:
@@ -135,11 +135,9 @@ describe('TreeProcessor', function() {
|
||||
|
||||
const result = processor.processTree();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfTopSuite()).toEqual([
|
||||
{ suite: node, segmentNumber: 0 }
|
||||
]);
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfTopSuite()).toEqual([{ suite: node }]);
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(node)).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuiteSegment(node, 0)).toEqual([{ spec: leaf1 }]);
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuite(node)).toEqual([{ spec: leaf1 }]);
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(node)).toEqual(true);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -167,37 +165,37 @@ describe('TreeProcessor', function() {
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(parent)).toEqual(false);
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfTopSuite()).toEqual([
|
||||
{ suite: parent, segmentNumber: 0 },
|
||||
{ suite: parentOfPendings, segmentNumber: 0 }
|
||||
{ suite: parent },
|
||||
{ suite: parentOfPendings }
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(parentOfPendings)).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuiteSegment(parentOfPendings, 0)).toEqual([
|
||||
{ suite: childless, segmentNumber: 0 },
|
||||
{ suite: pendingNode, segmentNumber: 0 }
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuite(parentOfPendings)).toEqual([
|
||||
{ suite: childless },
|
||||
{ suite: pendingNode }
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(childless)).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuiteSegment(childless, 0)).toEqual([]);
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuite(childless)).toEqual([]);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(pendingLeaf)).toEqual(false);
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(executableLeaf)).toEqual(false);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(parent)).toEqual(false);
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuiteSegment(parent, 0)).toEqual([
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuite(parent)).toEqual([
|
||||
{ spec: pendingLeaf },
|
||||
{ spec: executableLeaf }
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(pendingNode)).toEqual(true);
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuiteSegment(pendingNode, 0)).toEqual([
|
||||
expect(result.childrenOfSuite(pendingNode)).toEqual([
|
||||
{ spec: childOfPending }
|
||||
]);
|
||||
|
||||
expect(result.isExcluded(childOfPending)).toEqual(false);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('throws if the specified order would re-enter a node that does not allow re-entry', function() {
|
||||
it('throws if the specified order would re-enter a node', function() {
|
||||
const leaf1 = new Leaf(),
|
||||
leaf2 = new Leaf(),
|
||||
leaf3 = new Leaf(),
|
||||
@@ -210,29 +208,7 @@ describe('TreeProcessor', function() {
|
||||
|
||||
expect(function() {
|
||||
processor.processTree();
|
||||
}).toThrowError(
|
||||
'Invalid order: would cause a beforeAll or afterAll to be run multiple times'
|
||||
);
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it('does not throw if a node being re-entered allows re-entry', function() {
|
||||
const leaf1 = new Leaf();
|
||||
const leaf2 = new Leaf();
|
||||
const leaf3 = new Leaf();
|
||||
const reentered = new Node({ children: [leaf1, leaf2] });
|
||||
const root = new Node({ children: [reentered, leaf3] });
|
||||
const processor = new privateUnderTest.TreeProcessor({
|
||||
tree: root,
|
||||
runnableIds: [leaf1.id, leaf3.id, leaf2.id]
|
||||
});
|
||||
const env = jasmineUnderTest.getEnv();
|
||||
spyOn(env, 'deprecated');
|
||||
|
||||
processor.processTree();
|
||||
|
||||
expect(env.deprecated).toHaveBeenCalledWith(
|
||||
'The specified spec/suite order splits up a suite, running unrelated specs in the middle of it. This will become an error in a future release.'
|
||||
);
|
||||
}).toThrowError('Invalid order: would split up a suite');
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
it("does not throw if a node which can't be re-entered is only entered once", function() {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user