This is noisier, but it maintains compatibility with reporters that assume
(quite reasonably) that all specs and suites are either filtered out or
reported.
Add support for running jasmine multiple times.
```js
const Jasmine = require('jasmine');
async function main() {
const jasmine = new Jasmine({ projectBaseDir: process.cwd() });
let specId = 'spec0';
jasmine.loadConfigFile('./spec/support/jasmine.json');
jasmine.env.configure({
specFilter(sp) {
return sp.id === specId;
},
autoCleanClosures: false
});
jasmine.exit = () => {};
await jasmine.execute();
specId = 'spec2';
await jasmine.execute();
}
main().catch((err) => {
console.error(err);
process.exitCode = 1;
});
```
With `jasmine.env.configure({ autoCleanClosures: false })` you disable Jasmine's feature to automatically clean closures (functions) during the test run. This is a requirement to be able to rerun.
When `execute` is called more than once, the `topSuite.reset` is called, which will reset the state for the next run as well as reset any child suites.
Add a function `exclude` to the `Suite` and `Spec` clases. This functions similar to `pend`, but will allow the "pending" state to persist over multiple runs. This is useful when `xit` is used.
Revert changes to jasmine.js
fix: make sure to call hooks during second run
Remove jsdoc from private apis
Fix elint issue
Add new line
Because pending() is implemented via the standard exception handling
path, we effectively got this feature for free as a result of the changes
for #1533, particularly 457a2727.
* [#178598493]
* Fixes#1579
Note: afterEach() functions are still run, because skipping them is
highly likely to pollute specs that run after the failure.
[Finishes #92252330]
- Fixes#577
- Fixes#807
It was discovered that afterAll hooks run in the same order that you add them,
while afterEach hooks were running in reverse order. This commit makes their
order consistent, and adds regression tests.
Relevant issue - https://github.com/jasmine/jasmine/issues/1311
- execute beforeAll/afterAll once per suite instead of once per child
when running focused specs/suites Fixes#773
- refuse to execute an order if it would cause a suite with a beforeAll
or afterAll to be re-entered after leaving once
- report children of an xdescribe similarly to how they would be
reported if they were themselves x'd out Fixes#774
- only process the tree once instead of figuring it out again at each
level
[finishes #87545620]
Fixes#776
- This requires passing if runnables are set to the Suite. Hopefully in
the future we will change how focused runnables and *Alls interact so
this is no longer necessary.
[#732]
- Focused runnables now walk up the tree to unfocus the first focused
ancestor. Because of the way the tree is constructed, this makes sure
that each focused runnable has no focused ancestors.
[#78289686]
Required duplicating some of the logic for constructing a suite from
describe so that we could mark a suite as focused in fdescribe, but
otherwise this prevents focused tests from being run more than once.
[#73742944]
Yo, this probably isn't the best behavior. Rspec and Ginkgo definitely
do not exhibit this behavior when you nest focused runnables inside
other focused runnables. We thought fixing it, but it seems like a
nontrivial refactoring would be necessary to clean this up.
[#73742944]
