This makes failures somewhat easier to read. We still preserve whitespace
within lines to make whitespace-only failures readable, e.g.
expect('foo bar').toEqual('foo bar'). See #296.
- Pass file and line number to reporters when present
- Show file and line number in the HTML reporter when present
- Visually separate adjacent errors in the HTML reporter
[#24901981]
This is a fix for issue #917.
It seems that 'symbols' was originally included as a performance optimization, to avoid repeated find() calls for '.jasmine-symbol-summary'. However this find() occasionally fails during initialize if the dom has not loaded completely.
This change will not affect performance, as symbols is still cached. However it improves upon the original code in that the find happens at a stage much later than initialize.
The only difference between this commit and the previous is that I have
used a difference scheme for naming Jasmine CSS classes.
Instead of appending "_jasmine-css" to all Jasmine CSS selectors, I have
now preprended "jasmine-" instead.
As described in Issue Report 844...
https://github.com/jasmine/jasmine/issues/844
...style rules in the app-being-tested may incidentally affect elements
in the Jasmine HTML Report container, as long as there is a chance that
the app-being-tested has CSS style rules for classes (or IDs) that
Jasmine uses.
This fix attempts to bring Jasmine to a state where each and every class
it uses always ends with "_jasmine-css" which should be unique enough to
ensure that CSS in the app-being-tested won't affect the Jasmine report,
because no app-being-tested is ever likely to use classes that end with
"_jasmine-css"
I'll be surpised if this commit is good enough as it is now, on the
first attempt to fix#844, because of reasons I'll explain in either
the Issue or the Pull Request.
I removed the `.showDetails` and `.summaryMenuItem` styles from the Sass
file because I believe that no HTML elements with those classes will
ever be generated by Jasmine and that they are dead code that someone
forgot to remove.
This is my first contribution to the Jasmine project and so I might be
doing something wrong, but I believe just this one change will propagate
to all the generated code when it is built, and that I should not be
altering any other code in any other place to accomplish the change I
intend.
This is related to Jasmine Issue 847:
https://github.com/jasmine/jasmine/issues/847
This makes the specs green and appears to work for most cases. I have a
number of concerns about the implementation and would appreciate
ideas/feedback.
- Suite#addExpecationResult infers if it is coming from an afterAll fn
based on if the first child of the suite is finished. This assumes
that the first child of the suite is a spec (this appears to be true
as long as there is at least one spec in the suite)
- Suites behave like unfinished specs. Because suites will propagate
expectation failures to their children suites, the afterAll
expectation reporting appears to work for suites without specs
unless you have:
1) An otherwise empty suite with an afterAll
2) An afterAll'd suite whose first suite is empty (or whose first
suite's first suite is empty (and so on))
- Changed afterAllError to afterAllEvent, so it can accommodate both
errors and expectation failures. The reporter now receives a string
instead of the actual error object. The loss of the object doesn't
affect our reporters, but may be a nice-to-have for other reporters/
the future.
- The gap between the expectations caught in Suite and QueueRunner (who
triggers reporting via an injected callback) is an array injected into
QR by the Suite. The array is then flushed at some point (currently
after the attempt… functions). This works, but is a bit goofy.
[#73741654]
- Having the 'empty' state for a spec result can be considered a
breaking change to the reporter interface
- Instead, we determine if a spec has no expectations using the added
key of 'passedExpectations' in combination of the 'failedExpectations'
to determine that there a spec is 'empty'
[fixes#73741032]
