* Top level private APIs (e.g. jasmine.private.whatever) are no longer
exposed
* jasmineRequire is no longer exposed
* core is self-booting
* Globals are automatically created in browsers. (They can subsequently
be removed by user code if desired.)
* Globals are *not* automatically created in Node. An installGlobals
function is exported instead. The jasmine package calls installGlobals
unless configured not to do so.
* In Node, the same instance is returned each time jasmine-core is
imported. A reset function is exported. It effectively resets all state
by discarding the env and creating a new one. This allows mulitple
sequential runs within the same process to be independent of each
other, but does not allow multiple concurrent runs. (That probably never
worked anyway.)
Fixes#2094
This isn't comprehensive but it should be broad enough to ensure that most
people who would be affected by blocking monkey patching see a warning.
Covers the jasmine namespace as well as classes that are monkey patched by
zone.js.
Replacing globals (describe/it/etc) doesn't trigger a warning because they
belong to the user and are expected to be replaced.
Pretty printing is occasionally useful outside of the places where a
configured pretty printer is injected (matchers and asymmetric equality
testers). Users sometimes use the private basicPrettyPrinter for that.
jasmine.pp is part of the public interface and uses the current runable's
custom object formatters.
All current shipped versions of zone.js contain a monkey patch that fails
to pass constructor arguments on to GlobalErrors. That would crash Jasmine
if it was applied early enough to have any effect.
See <https://github.com/angular/angular/issues/63072>.
This isn't officially compatible with the oldest version of Node that
Jasmine supports, but it works. If it stops working, we can always disable
linting in CI builds on older Node versions.
This was intended as a 3.0 migration aid for browser users who had
dependencies that triggered errors at load time. However, it was never
documented and never supported by jasmine-brower-runner, karma, or any
other commonly used tool for runing Jasmine in the browser. There is
no evidence of it actually being used. It is, however, starting to
show up in machine-generated "tutorials".
These are similar to `expect` and `expectAsync` except that they throw
exceptions rather than recording matcher failures as spec/suite failures.
They're intended to support using Jasmine matchers in testing-library's
`waitFor`, and also provide a way to integration-test custom matchers.
These funtions are not equivalent to `expect` and `expectAsync` and should
not be used in situations where you want a matcher failure to reliably fail
the spec. Whether that happens depends on the structure of the surrounding
code. In general, you should only use `throwUnless` when you expect
something (which could be your own code or library code like `waitFor`) to
catch the resulting exception.
Fixes#2003.
Fixes#1980.
