According to the RFC 7143 11.4.5.1:
"Targets may set the residual count,and initiators may use
it when the response code is Command Completed at Target (even if the
status returned is not GOOD)."
Therefore valid retuned status may be not only GOOD. Also this check:
task->sense.ascq == SCSI_SENSE_ASCQ_INVALID_FIELD_IN_INFORMATION_UNIT
would make Underflow/Overflow response universal for FC/ISCSI.
RFC 3720 is not clear about whether a target should return SUCCESS
or CHECK CONDITION if SPDTL > EDTL. Hence accept both. See also
Fred Knight, Re: [Ips] Data Out residual overflow/underflow handling,
IETF mailing list archive, 21 September 2012
(http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ips/current/msg02756.html).
This patch reworks the changes introduced via commit
cfce944b35 and applies similar changes
to the other WRITE and WRITE VERIFY tests.
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Avoid that Valgrind reports complaints similar to the following:
Syscall param writev(vector[...]) points to uninitialised byte(s)
at 0x5567087: writev (writev.c:49)
by 0x5265AE0: iscsi_iovector_readv_writev (socket.c:492)
by 0x52666B5: iscsi_write_to_socket (socket.c:710)
by 0x5266CCC: iscsi_service (socket.c:852)
by 0x526751F: event_loop (sync.c:67)
by 0x5269B41: iscsi_scsi_command_sync (sync.c:1153)
by 0x4050F6: send_scsi_command (iscsi-support.c:245)
by 0x408007: compareandwrite (iscsi-support.c:1512)
by 0x40B6AD: test_compareandwrite_dpofua (test_compareandwrite_dpofua.c:69)
by 0x503EC99: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
by 0x503EF27: ??? (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
by 0x503F2A5: CU_run_all_tests (in /usr/lib/libcunit.so.1.0.1)
Address 0xffeffff10 is on thread 1's stack
in frame #8, created by test_compareandwrite_dpofua (test_compareandwrite_dpofua.c:30)
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bart.vanassche@sandisk.com>
Also test that IF the iSCSI layer provides 2 blocks of DATA-OUT but
the SCSI WRITE* command only covers one single block,
then only the first block will be modified but not the second block.
