Files
libiscsi/test-tool/test_writesame10_0blocks.c
Sitsofe Wheeler b908bdeb99 Tests: WRITESAME 0-blocks fixes and improvements
The current WRITE SAME (WS) 0 blocks test at LBA 0 isn't always correct
because if:
- The target's WSNZ bit set is 0
- The target's MAXIMUM WRITE SAME LENGTH (MWSL) is greater than 0
- We are issuing a WS with a NUMBER OF LOGICAL BLOCKS of 0

then whether the command should return success or failure depends on
whether the starting LBA is within MWSL blocks of the end of the LUN
(see http://www.t10.org/pipermail/t10/2016-May/017988.html for details).

Replace the vestigial code which tried to handle this (but no longer
worked since commit 8585e4509b ) and add
some additional MAXIMUM WRITE SAME LENGTH tests.

Signed-off-by: Sitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com>
2016-05-30 12:37:58 +01:00

103 lines
4.0 KiB
C

/* -*- mode:c; tab-width:8; c-basic-offset:8; indent-tabs-mode:nil; -*- */
/*
Copyright (C) 2013 Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program; if not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*/
#include <stdio.h>
#include <CUnit/CUnit.h>
#include "iscsi.h"
#include "scsi-lowlevel.h"
#include "iscsi-test-cu.h"
void
test_writesame10_0blocks(void)
{
CHECK_FOR_DATALOSS;
CHECK_FOR_SBC;
if (num_blocks >= 0x80000000) {
CU_PASS("LUN is too big for write-beyond-eol tests with WRITESAME10. Skipping test.\n");
return;
}
if (!inq_bl) {
CU_PASS("BlockLimits VPD is not available. Skipping test.\n");
return;
}
logging(LOG_VERBOSE, LOG_BLANK_LINE);
logging(LOG_VERBOSE, "Test WRITESAME10 0-blocks at LBA==0 (WSNZ=%d)",
inq_bl->wsnz);
memset(scratch, 0, block_size);
if (inq_bl->wsnz) {
WRITESAME10(sd, 0, block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, scratch,
EXPECT_INVALID_FIELD_IN_CDB);
logging(LOG_NORMAL, "[SKIPPED] WRITESAME10 does not support 0-blocks.");
return;
}
if (inq_bl->max_ws_len > 0 && num_blocks >= inq_bl->max_ws_len) {
WRITESAME10(sd, 0, block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, scratch,
EXPECT_INVALID_FIELD_IN_CDB);
} else {
WRITESAME10(sd, 0, block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, scratch,
EXPECT_STATUS_GOOD);
}
if (inq_bl->max_ws_len > 0) {
logging(LOG_VERBOSE,
"Test WRITESAME10 at MAXIMUM WRITE SAME LENGTH + 1 blocks "
"from end-of-LUN");
CHECK_SIZE((inq_bl->max_ws_len + 1),
WRITESAME10(sd, num_blocks - (inq_bl->max_ws_len + 1),
block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, scratch,
EXPECT_INVALID_FIELD_IN_CDB));
logging(LOG_VERBOSE,
"Test WRITESAME10 at MAXIMUM WRITE SAME LENGTH blocks "
"from end-of-LUN");
CHECK_SIZE(inq_bl->max_ws_len,
WRITESAME10(sd, num_blocks - inq_bl->max_ws_len,
block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, scratch,
EXPECT_STATUS_GOOD));
logging(LOG_VERBOSE,
"Test WRITESAME10 at MAXIMUM WRITE SAME LENGTH - 1 blocks "
"from end-of-LUN");
CHECK_SIZE((inq_bl->max_ws_len - 1),
WRITESAME10(sd, num_blocks - (inq_bl->max_ws_len - 1),
block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, scratch,
EXPECT_STATUS_GOOD));
} else {
logging(LOG_VERBOSE, "[SKIPPING] No MAXIMUM WRITE SAME LENGTH - "
"skipping MAXIMUM WRITE SAME LENGTH asserts.");
}
logging(LOG_VERBOSE, "Test WRITESAME10 0-blocks one block past end-of-LUN");
WRITESAME10(sd, num_blocks + 1, block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, scratch,
EXPECT_LBA_OOB);
logging(LOG_VERBOSE, "Test WRITESAME10 0-blocks at LBA==2^31");
WRITESAME10(sd, 0x80000000, block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, scratch,
EXPECT_LBA_OOB);
logging(LOG_VERBOSE, "Test WRITESAME10 0-blocks at LBA==-1");
WRITESAME10(sd, -1, block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, scratch,
EXPECT_LBA_OOB);
}