โšก MarkBase USB SSD Performance Test

๐Ÿ–ฅ๏ธ Select USB SSD Device
DSC2BA012T4 #1 (disk13)
USB 3.0 SSD โ€ข 1.2TB
1.21 TB
DSC2BA012T4 #2 (disk14)
USB 3.0 SSD โ€ข 1.2TB
1.18 TB
DSC2BA012T4 #3 (disk15)
USB 3.0 SSD โ€ข 1.2TB
1.20 TB
DSC2BA012T4 #4 (disk16)
USB 3.0 SSD โ€ข 1.2TB
1.19 TB
๐Ÿ“Š Current Performance Metrics
Copy Throughput
N/A
MB/sec
Avg Latency
N/A
ms
Cache Hit Rate
N/A
%
Files Processed
N/A
files
Total Size
N/A
MB
Test Duration
N/A
sec
๐Ÿงช Execute Performance Tests
Ready to run USB SSD performance tests... Instructions: 1. Select USB SSD device above 2. Click test button to execute 3. Monitor progress and results Current device: DSC2BA012T4 #1 (disk13) Expected throughput: 300-500 MB/sec (USB 3.0 SSD)
๐Ÿ” Performance Comparison
Test Type NVMe SSD USB SSD Performance Ratio Hybrid Advantage
Small Files Copy 138 GB/sec - - -
Large Files Copy 7.2 ms (1GB) - - -
Cache Hit Rate 100% - - -
Query Latency 1.58 ms - - -
๐Ÿ’ก Analysis & Recommendations
Hybrid Architecture Analysis: โœ… Advantages on USB SSD: โ€ข Lower hardware performance โ†’ Software optimization more impactful โ€ข USB latency higher โ†’ Cache benefits more significant โ€ข HDD-like scenario โ†’ Hybrid architecture shines โš ๏ธ Considerations: โ€ข USB SSD still fast (300-500 MB/sec) โ€ข Extra overhead (cache query) still present โ€ข Need real-world workload testing ๐ŸŽฏ Recommendations: โ€ข Test FUSE hot path (repeated file access) โ€ข Test metadata queries (SQL operations) โ€ข Test HDD scenario (150 MB/sec baseline) โ€ข Compare NVMe vs USB vs HDD Expected Results: โ€ข USB SSD: Hybrid 20-30% faster than Traditional โ€ข HDD: Hybrid 50-100% faster than Traditional โ€ข Network Storage: Hybrid 2-5x faster