admin/libiscsi
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 2 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

MULTIPATH TEST: use READ10/WRITE10 instead of READ16/WRITE16

Browse Source 
Many small devices do not implement the 16 version of these commands.

Signed-off-by: Ronnie Sahlberg <ronniesahlberg@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Ronnie Sahlberg
2015-06-01 21:27:51 -07:00
parent 3601799a1b
commit 2388db9f12
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
test-tool/test_multipathio_simple.c
View File

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ test_multipathio_simple(void)
read_path = (write_path + 1) % mp_num_sds;
logging(LOG_VERBOSE,
"Test multipath WRITE16/READ16 of 1-256 blocks using "
"Test multipath WRITE10/READ10 of 1-256 blocks using "
"path %d", write_path);
for (i = 1; i <= 256; i++) {
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ test_multipathio_simple(void)
&& maximum_transfer_length < i) {
break;
}
ret = write16(mp_sds[write_path], 0, i * block_size,
ret = write10(mp_sds[write_path], 0, i * block_size,
block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, write_buf,
EXPECT_STATUS_GOOD);
if (ret == -2) {
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ test_multipathio_simple(void)
}
CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(ret, 0);
ret = read16(mp_sds[read_path], NULL, 0, i * block_size,
ret = read10(mp_sds[read_path], NULL, 0, i * block_size,
block_size, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, read_buf,
EXPECT_STATUS_GOOD);
CU_ASSERT_EQUAL(ret, 0);